464 F.3d 450 (3d Cir. 2006)
Flitter Milz challenged a debt collector's statement that the client's case "could be referred for suit" when they never sue. The lower federal court held that "could" was truthful, since the matter could be sent for a collection suit against the consumer. On appeal, the Court reversed, finding that even if technically true, it was still deceptive for the collector to suggest that suit might be coming when it would not be. This first-of-its-kind decision in the 3d Circuit has become important precedent for pro-consumer limitations on debt collectors and has since been cited hundreds of times by other courts. The landmark case became featured in a story by Time Magazine, Sue Up or Shut Up!
To learn more about the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Unfair Debt Collection
We at Flitter Milz, P.C., hope that you and your loved ones remain healthy and safe throughout this difficult time. We want you to know that our firm is open to serve your legal needs. Our staff is available by phone, email, or video conference. Please feel free to call with any questions or specific concerns.
Take care and be safe.
Cary Flitter & Andy Milz
Toll Free: 888-668-1225