How to Use this Resource

We hope the articles below help you understand your rights as a consumer. You can scroll through the titles, or sort by Practice Area or Topic. You can also use the search feature to locate information by keyword.

Flitter Milz represents people with a variety of problems involving consumer credit and collections. If you have a particular question or believe your consumer rights have been violated, Contact Us for a no cost consultation.

What You Should Know About the Use of E-Signatures

Electronic signatures—or e-signatures—are everywhere. We click “Agree” or type our name on a device to open bank accounts, purchase vehicles, rent apartments, or accept online terms. Before you sign electronically, here’s what to know.

Are E-Signatures as binding as an actual “Wet Ink” Signature? Not Always!

An e-signature can be as valid as a handwritten one, but only if certain rules are met. Businesses must get your consent to use electronic records. As well, they must prove you can open and read them.  Often a test file is sent to the consumer to confirm receipt. The business must also inform the consumer of the following:

1. The option to receive paper copies
2. The option to withdraw consent at anytime, and explain how to do it.
3. Whether consent applies to one deal or all future ones.
4. How to update contact information.
5. The type of device or software is needed to receive communications.

These safeguards exist so that consumers are not tricked into signing documents that may be difficult to see online or save. 

What is an “E-Signature”?     

The term “e-signature” is more than a digital image of your written signature. The law defines “electronic signature” broadly. It is any sound, symbol, or process used to show intent to sign a document. E-signatures can be:

      • Typing your name at the end of an email
      • Clicking an “I agree” button
      • Uploading an image of your handwritten signature
      • Saying “yes” in a recorded call.

The key is intent—you must intend to sign the electronic contract that your signature is applied to. But some companies may forge or copy and paste e-signatures to contracts that were never approved by the consumer. Forging an e-signature is illegal, just like forging a signature in ink on paper.

What “Metadata” Reveals

When you sign electronically, the system stores “metadata”, or hidden information that proves authenticity of the electronic document. Metadata
can show:

  • Personal information: name, email or IP address
  • Time and place: exact date, time and location when a signature was applied
  • Device details: the computer, phone, tablet, or other device used to apply the signature
  • Security codes: Digital ID that shows the file was not changed.

Metadata can even show whether a signature was forged—like proving it came from a location you had never been or device you never used.

Are ink signatures on paper documents still required? 

While e-signatures are legal on many documents, some notices, such as those listed below, are required to be delivered in paper form and signed in ink.  This is to insure that the person is fully informed and in agreement with the document.

      • Car repossession or mortgage foreclosure notices
      • Utility, insurance, or benefit cancellations
      • Eviction notices
      • Lawsuits
      • Product recalls or safety warnings
      • Documents involving hazardous materials

The Bottom Line

Be cautious.

E-signatures are fast and convenient. Used correctly, they are safe and legally binding. However, salespeople are trained to guide consumers in the purchase process and make them feel comfortable to get an e-signature on the documents they need.

Do your due diligence BEFORE e-signing
1) Take time to read all documents that are signed.
2) Get all questions answered.
3) Do not feel pressured to sign.
4) Request a paper copy of all documents showing your e-signature.
5) Maintain a complete file with all documents, handwritten notes, emails, text and phone messages.

Seek help from a qualified consumer law firm

Was your e-signature forged on a document? Were you tricked into an agreement?
Contact us.
Flitter Milz has helped many consumers across the country hold companies accountable for electronic forgery and deceptive practices in the use of
e-signatures.

For a no cost legal evaluation.
Phone:   888-668-1225
Email:    consumers@consumerslaw.com

Timeshare Deception Lawsuit: Jury Awards over $1M to Consumers

 Pictured:  Attorney Joe Solseng, Clients Jay & Carmen Seda, Attorneys Andy Milz & Dave Ricci

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J.Oct. 6, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — A Superior Court jury in New Jersey decided in favor of consumers deceived by timeshare seller FantaSea Resorts, awarding the plaintiffs a $1,069,285 verdict for the Atlantic City resort’s intentionally deceptive sales practices. The victory for consumers was championed by Schroeter Goldmark & Bender along with partners, Flitter Milz, PC and the Law Office of David Ricci.

The jury verdict will compensate a group of 19 plaintiffs whose consumer protection rights were violated by repeated misrepresentations throughout FantaSea Resort’s routine, deceptive sales practices. The jury agreed that FantaSea’s tactics left consumers with timeshare purchases they couldn’t use as described, with payments and rising maintenance fees they couldn’t escape.

“FantaSea stacked the deck against these families from the start,” said Joe Solseng, attorney with Schroeter Goldmark & Bender. “We’re grateful for the jury’s hard work and their willingness to hold FantaSea accountable for its systemic lies and deception, which turned a promised fantasy into a nightmare.”

In trial, FantaSea Resorts admitted to making knowingly false statements to lure potential buyers into binding timeshare sales agreements through a sales process that violated the New Jersey Real Estate Timeshare Act (RETA). According to court documents, FantaSea intentionally withheld important sales documents from the buyers until after they had completed the transaction, contrary to what they are legally required to do.

FantaSea, a participant in the Resort Owner’s Coalition (ROC) of the American Resort Development Association (ARDA) whose properties include its Flagship, Atlantic Palace and La Sammana resorts, also misled consumer plaintiffs into believing that their purchase was a real estate investment that would increase in value over time. Instead, plaintiffs in the suit found that they were not only unable to sell their timeshare purchase but that it had effectively no resale value.

“FantaSea Resorts had every opportunity to change its deceptive practices and comply with consumer protection laws before these plaintiffs were forced to bring this lawsuit against them. These families simply wanted out of these oppressive contracts, but FantaSea doubled down  on their deception and made these families bring their case to trial. We hope this verdict sends a message that fraud of this nature won’t be tolerated,” said attorney Andrew Milz with Cherry Hill, New Jersey-based law firm Flitter Milz, PC.  

FantaSea Resorts admitted to committing multiple violations throughout the sales process by failing to inform buyers of required legal disclosures and withholding important documents that revealed details about the timeshare until after the buyer had signed a purchase and sale agreement.

What’s more, FantaSea’s timeshare sales were rigged so that timeshare owners would routinely pay more for a vacation stay than non-owners, according to court documents. In one case, over the length of the plaintiff’s 10-year mortgage, she would pay more than $17,000 for five one-week stays throughout the decade. A non-owner would pay just $3,965 for those same five stays. Even if the plaintiff continued to use her timeshare after her 10-year mortgage was paid off, it would take more than 150 years to break even with the non-owner. Another plaintiff testified at trial that it would take him 168 years to break even with a non-owner. Pictured above:  Attorneys Joe Solseng (l), Andy Milz (r), & Clients Brian & Jenny Roward

“What’s concerning for consumers is that business models like these, that are intentionally built to take advantage of good people, are not unique to FantaSea – and in fact, there are many resorts in the timeshare space that are even more egregious in their deceptive practices,” Solseng said. “I don’t recommend that anyone attend a timeshare presentation, no matter how much they entice you with gifts.”

Solseng added, “FantaSea and certain other ARDA timeshare outfits often use the word ‘Vacation Ownership’ so as to not call it a timeshare. But it’s a timeshare through and through, and the so-called vacation ownership can quickly turn into a vacation nightmare. We hope that the jury’s verdict and nullification of these FantaSea contracts will help other FantaSea timeshare owners and their lawyers. We hope this verdict is a way forward for plaintiff’s lawyers across the country to help timeshare consumers who are in the same position our clients were.”

About Plaintiffs Counsel

Flitter Milz, P.C. 

Flitter Milz, PC, with offices in PA, NJ, and NY, is a nationally recognized leader in consumer protection law, with over 30 years’ experience in the field. The firm represents victims of finance fraud, illegal vehicle repossessions, unfair debt collection practices, credit report errors, civil rights abuses, and other consumer protection matters in individual and class action cases.  Pictured:  Cary Flitter (center), Andy Milz (left), Jody López-Jacobs (right).

Schroeter Goldmark & Bender

Founded in 1969, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender (SGB) is a nationally recognized law firm based in Seattle that holds the most powerful companies, government agencies, and people accountable for their wrongdoing. SGB focuses on representing individuals in consumer protection cases, along with injured persons in aviation, asbestos and mesothelioma, catastrophic injury, brain/spinal cord injury, medical malpractice, unsafe products, wrongful death, sexual assault and harassment, as well as individual and class action employment cases. The firm believes the law is a force of good and is committed to achieving justice for people who have been harmed.